Where AI Runs Is Becoming the Real Compliance Decision in Higher Ed
A new University of Toronto infrastructure role signals that data placement, not policy language, is now the operative control for campus AI governance.
A new University of Toronto infrastructure role signals that data placement, not policy language, is now the operative control for campus AI governance.
Contracts are filling the gap FERPA and COPPA left open, but without NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001 documentation behind them, institutions still can't verify vendor claims.
Instructor-level AI policies solve academic integrity optics but leave the actual FERPA exposure, student data flowing into third-party tools, largely unaddressed.
Education and workforce programs are scaling AI training fast, but enrollment numbers are not the competency evidence ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act require.
As colleges route student data through AI tools for advising and administration, FERPA and state privacy laws expose a vendor accountability gap that conduct policies don't touch.
The AI decision campuses are behind on is not curriculum design but whether vendor data practices can survive a FERPA audit.
Florida now requires every state college and school district to adopt AI policy by 2027, revealing how uneven and incomplete campus-level AI governance still is.